Method: This was a pre/post test experimental design study. The pre-test involved all participants trying to shoot 3 foul shots. Four classes of third graders from a local elementary school participated in the study. Each of the classes received 20 minutes of free throw instruction/activities within three 40-minute classes. Two of the classes received instruction using the Wii and the other two received instruction using traditional methods. After the 3 periods of instruction, the participants tried to shoot 3 foul shots for the post-test. Data were collected through videotaping the participants as they performed the free throws during the pre-test and all post-test games and recording the number of successful shots.
Analysis/Results: Data were analyzed two ways: (1) comparing the recorded performances for proper free throw technique (skills) using the rubric that was developed for this study, and (2) comparing the number of baskets made during the pre and post test trials. Results indicate that there was more positive transference for the group that was taught with the traditional method than the Wii, even though there was some positive transference from the Wii group.
Conclusions: Implication of the study is that the traditional method was more effective than the Wii when teaching basketball free throws. The Wii can also be an effective tool for teaching this skill as long as there is emphasis placed on form and technique. Not only was this an important factor with the Wii, but also it is an important factor on both the traditional method and Wii group participants’ improvement.