Method: In order to achieve this, seven PETE students travelled from a relatively small town in the north-central United States to a large metropolitan center in the Southwest United States where they participated in a variety of professional development opportunities. These activities included visiting local schools to observe physical education lessons taught by accomplished physical educators who employed a variety of strategies and curriculum models, participating in PETE methods classes at large university with an accomplished PETE program, assisting in the facilitation of out-of-class physical activity programs, and attending an in-service development seminar. Multiple data were collected from all participants and included journal entries, field notes from debriefing sessions and interviews.
Analysis/Results: These data were analyzed inductively using an interpretive approach (Erickson, 1986; LeCompte & Schensul, 1999) from which the notion of “seeing is believing” emerged as a pattern associated with achieving the “Aha!” moment across all data types. This led to the assertion that pre-service teachers need opportunities to physically observe and engage in diverse experiences in order to bridge the theory-to-practice gap.
Conclusions: Finding ways to bridge the theory-to-practice gap in PETE is relevant when considering the development of prospective physical education teachers. The authors are not suggesting that programs that lack access to curricular and programmatic diversity in the schools surrounding their university must replicate this novel experience. Rather, the intention of this work is to begin a discussion within PETE of how we can effectively prepare physical education teachers by employing best practices relative to engaging with theory and practice.