Why Urban High School Students Attend After-School Physical Activity Clubs

Wednesday, March 14, 2012
Poster Areas 1 and 2 (Foyer Outside Exhibit Hall C) (Convention Center)
Kimberly Maljak1, Nate McCaughtry1, Alex C. Garn2, Jeffrey Martin1, Bo Shen1 and Mariane M. Fahlman1, (1)Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, (2)Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA

Background/Purpose School-based physical activity (PA) opportunities beyond PE classes could potentially address the chronic inactivity of vulnerable youth (i.e., urban/minority/low socio-economic/females/non-athletes), yet little research examines why high school-aged youth might attend voluntary opportunities, especially in urban communities. The purpose of this study was to examine urban high school students' rationale for attending after-school Physical Activity Clubs (PACs).

Method Adult leaders formed PACs at 14 urban high schools as “fun, safe, supportive places to do PA with friends.” Clubs were student-centered, targeted traditionally inactive students, and avoided competitive sports. Over two years, 557 PAC sessions were conducted averaging 18.2 students (83% females, 17% males). One hundred and two semi-structured interviews were conducted with 204 students. Data were analyzed using constant comparison and trustworthiness was facilitated through prolonged engagement and member checks.

Analysis/Results Six themes emerged to explain why students attended PACs: a.) health concerns (worried about weight, pre-diabetic, to stay fit, makes bodies feel good); b.) be part of something (few opportunities outside school, reason for coming to school); c.) feel safe and supported by trusted adult (absence of positive role models); d.) something positive to do, avoid trouble; e.) socialize with friends; f.) learn more than sports (little participation in sport-dominated PE classes, clamor for rhythmic activities).

Conclusions Findings suggest that PACs may be positive health-enhancing and pro-social alternatives to athletics for many students who are traditionally vulnerable to inactivity. They suggest that students' rationale for participation is multi-faceted, which may prove useful in developing and advertising future programs.