Purpose
The purpose of this was to study was twofold: One, to further examine using a Sport Education model to improve both cardiovascular fitness and motor skill development and two, to determine if a typical Sport Education season would improve fitness without additional conditioning.
Methods
Male (n=20) and female (n=6) university students enrolled in a physical education course completed an 18-lesson season of “Ultimate-Lacrosse.” A combination of ultimate and lacrosse, the sport was designed by the instructor as a game to play indoors, where space is at a premium. Participants performed two pre- and post-season tests to assess cardiovascular fitness and basic throwing skills. To assess fitness, the PACER test of aerobic fitness was used. To assess throwing accuracy, participants performed a skill test used by Landin, Hebert, Menickelli, and Grisham (2003) to assess the same throwing skills. Mean radial error was used to assess accuracy of throws at a target.
Analysis/Results
The results of paired sample t-tests indicated that scores on the PACER test improved significantly (.000) from the pre test (m = 41.76, sd = 8.89) to the post test (m = 55.15, sd = 3.06); forehand throwing accuracy improved significantly (.000) from the pre test (m = 6.74, sd = 1.25) to the post test (m = 4.60, sd = 1.78); and backhand throwing accuracy improved significantly (.004) from the pre test (m = 5.12, sd = 1.44) to the post test (m = 3.97, sd = 1.63). There were no significant gender differences.
Conclusions
The results of this study provide evidence that a Sport Education curriculum model can improve both cardiovascular fitness and motor skill development without additional conditioning.
See more of: Research Consortium