Scheduled for Research Consortium Grant Presentations, Friday, April 12, 2002, 8:45 AM - 10:00 AM, San Diego Convention Center: Room 7B


Application of Direct Observation Techniques for the Calibration of Activity Monitors with Children

Gregory J. Welk1, Darren Dale2 and Jodee Schaben1, (1)Iowa State University, Ames, IA, (2)Eastern Connecticut State University, Willimantic, CT

Accelerometry-based activity monitors offer promise for assessing free-living physical activity patterns. Most studies to date have used treadmill protocols and/or continuous activity to calibrate monitors but these protocols are not appropriate for assessing children’s intermittent physical activity patterns. The purpose of this study is to calibrate the CSA monitor using a direct observation technique which allow for continuous coding of physical activity behavior. The participants in the study were 29 children ages 8-12 years enrolled in a summer fitness camp at a University location. Children wore a CSA activity monitor and a heart rate (HR) monitor during both structured (7 specific tasks) and unstructured (active games) activities. The monitors were synchronized and programmed to record data at 5-second intervals during one of the days at the camp. Videotaped recordings of the sessions were coded using a computerized observation tool (BEST) that was programmed to work with the Children’s Activity Record System (CARS). The activities were coded into 4 categories and the mean activity level in each 5-second interval was computed (Obs) and matched with the HR and CSA data by time. Regression analyses were conducted using the averaged data from the structured activities to predict the observed activity levels. This equation was then applied to the data from the unstructured activities to cross validate the results. Pairwise correlations were computed separately for each individual to assess the temporal matching of the data. The correlations between Obs and CSA ranged from .62 to .94 (mean: r=.79) while the correlation between HR and CSA ranged from .56 to .81 (mean: r=.67). The group-based regression equation predicting observation scores from averaged CSA data yielded an R2 of .61 and a SEE of .56. When the equation was applied to the separate cross validation sample, the correlation between measured and predicted observation scores was moderate (r=.58). The difference between measured and predicted scores (-.03) was non-significant but Altman Bland plots revealed a tendency to overestimate lower intensity activities and underestimate higher intensity activities. Overall, the study provides preliminary support for the use of this calibration equation but additional work is recommended to test its use in other populations and for different activities. Support for project was obtained from a Research Consortium Grant for 2000.
Keyword(s): . NA

Back to the 2002 AAHPERD National Convention and Exposition