Urban Children's Motivation Profiles in School Physical Activity

Wednesday, April 2, 2014
Exhibit Hall Poster Area 1 (Convention Center)
Bo Shen1, Erin E. Centeio1, Nathan McCaughtry1, Alex C. Garn2, Noel L. Kulik1, Lila Murphy Gutuskey1 and Kimberly A. Maljak1, (1)Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, (2)Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA
Background/Purpose:

Childhood obesity has emerged as a public health crisis in the United States. Schools are uniquely situated to combat this disturbing trend and offer untapped opportunities for promoting physical activity and health for all school-aged children. It has been recognized that understanding motivation characteristics and its influence on health-related outcomes is the key to develop and evaluate effective obesity-prevention strategies. Using expectancy-value theory as a representative of motivation, this study was designed to examine urban inner-city children’s motivation profiles in school physical activity and their associations with physical activity engagement, healthy eating enjoyment, perceived quality of life, and body composition. 

Method:

338 participants (192 females and 146 males, age range=8-12 years, mean age=9.40 years) in six urban elementary schools completed questionnaires assessing relevant psychological and behavioral constructs. Body weight and height were measured with portable scales and in-school physical activity engagement was quantified using Actigraph accelerometers. A two-step cluster analysis determined the profiles that would result from the interactions among expectancy-value theory variables (i.e., perceived competence, importance, interest, and usefulness) and in-school physical activity engagement. A MANOVA was used to analyze differences between clusters.  

Analysis/Results:

The cluster analysis with Silhouette measure of cohesion and separation supported a three-cluster solution: the high-motivated and high PA engaged (cluster 1: N=98), high-motivated but low-PA engaged (cluster 2: N=110), and low-motivated (cluster 3: N=130). To understand the differences among the clusters, a MANOVA with the cluster groups as the independent variable was conducted. Results indicated significant overall differences among cluster groups, Wilks’ Λ=.14, F (12, 660) = 75.25, p<.01. Univariate follow-ups using Fisher’s LSD procedure revealed that there were significant differences in expectancy-value theory variables and physical activity engagement among the three clusters. Children in clusters 1 & 2 reported higher healthy-eating enjoyment and positive quality of life than those in cluster 3. In contrast, children’s body mass index (BMI) in cluster 1 was significantly lower than those in cluster 2 & 3.

Conclusions:

Results support that there is a dynamic web of interrelations among motivation, physical activity engagement, and health-related outcomes. Expectancy, task value, and physical activity engagement in school may play different roles in enhancing urban children’s healthy living.  School-based intervention programs must take both physical activity and motivation in physical activity into consideration simultaneously when designing effective promotion strategies.