Background/Purpose Previous research has indicated that sport education (SE) has structural advantages over traditional multi-activity (MA) teaching which may help preservice teachers (PTs) learning to teach. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of negotiations between pupils and PTs on PTs' instruction within MA teaching and SE.
Method Participants were 17 PTs engaged in a secondary early field experience in which they taught 12-lesson MA and SE soccer units. Data were collected through formal, informal, and stimulated recall interviews, non-participant observation, document analysis, and critical incident reflections.
Analysis/Results Data were analyzed using analytic induction and constant comparison. Key findings were that pupils initiated negotiations aimed at securing changes in instructional tasks and a reduction in standards of performance for those tasks. High skilled and aggressive boys were more likely to negotiate than other pupils and focused primarily on increasing the amount of game play within lessons. PTs initiated negotiations aimed at securing compliance with instructional and managerial tasks. During MA instruction, negotiations were relatively negative and common, increased as the unit progressed, and adversely influenced the effectiveness of the majority of PTs' pedagogies. During SE instruction, negotiations were relatively positive and infrequent, declined as the season progressed, and enabled PTs to deliver comparatively good quality physical education.
Conclusions The results of the study suggest that PETE faculty would do well to feature SE more prominently than MA instruction and provide further indication that requiring PTs to teach parallel MA and SE units is a good strategy for PETE faculty to employ.
See more of: Research Consortium