Method: A total of 260 (147 male, 113 female) college students served as participants in this study. They completed the 2 x 2 Achievement Goal and Persistence Questionnaire-Physical Education adapted from Guan, McBride, Xiang, and Bruene (2006). The 2 x 2 achievement goal questionnaire consists of 12 items reflecting four achievement goals: mastery-approach, performance-approach, performance-avoidance, and mastery-avoidance. The persistence questionnaire includes 4 items. The format for all items is a 7-point Likert-type scale, ranging from 1 (not at all true for me) through 7 (very true for me). The stem for all items is “In this class, my instructor…”.
Analysis/Results: Descriptive statistics of achievement goals revealed that students reported the highest value on mastery approach goals (M = 6.16, SD = .71), followed by mastery avoidance goals (M = 4.81, SD = 1.29), performance approach goals (M = 3.13, SD = 1.19), performance avoidance goals (M = 2.85, SD = 1.39). The multiple regression analysis revealed that performance approach goals (â = .25, t = 3.29, p <.01) and mastery approach goals (â = .13, t = 2.00, p <.05) were significantly positive predictors of students' self-reported persistence, whereas performance avoidance goals (â = -1.54, t = 2.06, p <.05) were the significantly negative predictor. Additionally, mastery avoidance goals (â = .11, t = 1.56, p = .12) were not significant predictor of students' self-reported persistence.
Conclusions: The research findings are generally consistent with the achievement goal literature that mastery approach and performance approach goals are positively related to students' self-reported persistence. Based on the findings, we advocate using the 2 x 2 model to further examine student motivation and achievement in college PA settings.
See more of: Research Consortium