Purpose: Participating in an organized physical activity class or group
exercise program is an important vehicle to develop good exercise habits and
attitudes toward exercise (Dishman, 1988). Little research, however, has investigated
the mechanism of engagement in group exercise programs (Spink & Carron,
1994). Given that the most previous studies of exercise programs focus on
individual factors, more research is needed to examine the influence of social
constructs on exercise adherence in group settings. Group cohesion has been identified
as an important small group variable. This variable includes four related factors
that bind members to their group: Individual Attractions to Group-Task (ATG-T),
Individual Attractions to Group-Social (ATG-S), Group Integration-Task (GI-T)
and Group Integration-Social (GI-S) (Carron et al., 1985). Although group cohesion has been investigated in exercise
settings, sparse research has focused on
the relationship between cohesion constructs and students' achievement outcomes such as perceived effort and attendance in exercise domain. The main objective of the current study was to examine how measures of group cohesion during the early stages of
group development affect subsequent adherence behavior in college female
students participating in structured exercise classes.
Methods: Participants were 124 female
college students (M age = 21.37) enrolled
in aerobics classes at a southeastern university. They completed previously
validated questionnaires during the sixth week (group
cohesion constructs; Blanchard et al.,
2000) and thirteenth week (perceived
effort; McAuley & Duncan, 1989) of the
13-week
class. The class met three times per week, and attendance was monitored daily. Pearson correlations and multiple regression analyses
were used to assess the effects of group cohesion on students' perceived effort
and exercise attendance during the program.
Analysis/Results: Pearson
correlations indicated that group
cohesion correlated with perceived effort and exercise attendance. Multiple
regression analyses revealed that ATG-S and GI-T were positive predictors
of perceived effort (β = .25, p= .006; β = .22, p =
.015), accounting for 9.9% and 4.3% of the variance respectively. For exercise
attendance, ATG-T was a positive predictor (β = .36, p= .001), explaining
4.4% of the variance. In contrast, ATG-S was a negative predictor (β = - .28,
p= .007), explaining 5.6% of the variance.
Conclusions: The findings show that specific measures of group cohesive were associated with adherence behavior in exercise settings involving female college students. They provide insight into how to design a group
environment aimed at the promotion of exercise engagement for female college
students.